Pre-Litigation Analysis
Bad outcome, or bad medicine?
The story only takes you so far on a medical malpractice case. A physician reads the full medical records and walks you through what's in them: the timeline, the standard of care, causation, damages, and the gaps. Then you decide whether to take the case.
No written report. It's a conversation, and you can push on the medicine while a physician has the chart open.
$1,750 per analysis for non-members. Discounted for members.
How it works.
A physician reads the records, then walks you through them.
You send the recordsWhatever you have, plus the intake story for context. Members can escalate straight from the physician on-call line.
A medical director assigns the reviewerA physician who reads a chart for what a case turns on, not for what happens next clinically. Medicine and law meet in the record, and that's where the read happens.
The whole record gets readNot a summary of a summary. The chart, start to finish, against what the standard of care required at each step.
You get the analysis on a callPhone or video, with the reviewer who read it. Bring questions, push on the medicine. You come off the call knowing enough to take the case or pass on it.
What the record supports, and what it doesn't.
A timeline of the careEvery relevant event in order, built from the chart. What was known, when, and what was done about it.
The key clinical findings, and the standard of careWhat the record shows, measured against what the medicine required at the time. Where it holds up and where it doesn't.
Causation and damagesWhether the care caused the harm, and what the harm amounts to. The two places a case usually breaks.
What's missing, and what to do nextRecords that haven't been pulled, questions the chart doesn't answer, and where a closer look is worth the cost.
The experts this case will needStandard of care, causation, damages: which ones this case takes, and what each has to be able to say. Finding them is a Standard Search or a White Glove Search.
Every case gets the same questions. Not every case gets the same answers.
Nothing in writing. That's the point.
The analysis is a conversation with the physician who read the chart.
A conversation, not a documentDelivered live, by the physician who read the record. Ask what you want, push on the medicine, get an answer with the chart open.
The reviewer will never be a witness on your caseThat's what lets them tell you what's actually in the record, including the parts that hurt.
You hear the weak version tooWhat the record doesn't support, and what the defense will do with it.